Research Articles

Functional Outcomes of Measured Resection vs. Gap Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold standard surgical intervention for treating end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). Measured resection (MR) and gap balancing (GB) are the primary surgical techniques that are employed to achieve these outcomes. Each of these procedures has its own distinct principles and advantages; MR is completely based on predetermined bone cuts and femoral rotation whereas GB is truly based on native knee anatomy. Their comparative impact on short-term recovery, implant alignment, and long-term outcomes remains debated, highlighting the need for evidence-based guidance. This study was conducted to compare the functional outcomes, complications, and patient-related outcomes of these two different techniques in the hands of a single surgeon.

Methods: A prospective randomized study was carried out with 60 patients undergoing TKA. They were categorized as the MR group (Group MR) or the GB group (Group GB). Functional recovery was the primary outcome and was assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score. Secondary outcomes included tourniquet times, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and postoperative knee flexion at various intervals.

Results: The GB subset demonstrated statistically significant improvement one month following surgery in both KSS Part 1 (P < 0.001) and KSS Part 2 (P = 0.004) and larger reduction in WOMAC score (P < 0.001), suggesting rapid and comprehensive functional recovery and early improvement in pain and joint stiffness. However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant at 12 and 24 months post-operatively.

Conclusion: GB offers superior short-term outcomes, but the choice of surgical technique should take into account individual patient profile or patient-specific factors, the surgeon’s operative experience, and implant survivorship.

1. Moon YW, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Park CD, Lee DH. Comparison of soft tissue balancing, femoral component rotation, and joint line change between the gap balancing and measured resection techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(39):e5006. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000005006. [PubMed: 27684862]. [PubMed Central: PMC5265955].
2. Li S, Luo X, Wang P, Sun H, Wang K, Sun X. Clinical outcomes of gap balancing vs measured resection in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis involving 2259 subjects. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(8):2684-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.015. [PubMed: 29656972].
3. Pang HN, Yeo SJ, Chong HC, Chin PL, Ong J, Lo NN. Computer- assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(9):1496-503. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3. [PubMed: 21448662].
4. Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993(286):40-7. [PubMed: 8425366].
5. Crottet D, Kowal J, Sarfert SA, Maeder T, Bleuler H, Nolte LP, et al. Ligament balancing in TKA: evaluation of a force-sensing device and the influence of patellar eversion and ligament release. J Biomech. 2007;40(8):1709-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.08.004. [PubMed: 17094997].
6. Daines BK, Dennis DA. Gap balancing vs. measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.1. [PubMed: 24605183]. [PubMed Central: PMC3942594].
7. Hungerford DS. Measured resection: a valuable tool in TKA. Orthopedics. 2008;31(9):941-2. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080901-16. [PubMed: 18814623].
8. Whiteside LA, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995(321):168-72. [PubMed: 7497664].
9. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996(331):35-46. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199610000-00006. [PubMed: 8895617].
10. Sheth NP, Husain A, Nelson CL. Surgical techniques for total knee arthroplasty: Measured resection, gap balancing, and hybrid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(7):499-508. doi: 10.5435/jaaos-d-14-00320. [PubMed: 28644188].
11. Fehring TK. Rotational malalignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000(380):72-9. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200011000-00010. [PubMed: 11064975].
12. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Kim RH, Sharma A. Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(1):102-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1112-3. [PubMed: 19789934]. [PubMed Central: PMC2795818].
13. Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Pain management and accelerated rehabilitation for total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):12-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.040. [PubMed: 17919586].
14. Tapasvi SR, Shekhar A, Patil SS, Dipane MV, Chowdhry M, Mcpherson EJ. Comparison of gap balancing vs measured resection technique in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one technique per knee. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(3):732-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.002. [PubMed: 31676174].
15. Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Sun JN, An L, Chen XY, Feng S. Comparison of outcomes between gap balancing and measured resection techniques for total knee arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021;55(3):239-45. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20160. [PubMed: 34100365]. [PubMed Central: PMC10566348].
16. Huang T, Long Y, George D, Wang W. Meta-analysis of gap balancing versus measured resection techniques in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-b(2):151-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b2.Bjj-2016-0042.R2. [PubMed: 28148655].
17. Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kawakami Y, Takayama K, Ishida K, Matsushita T, et al. Soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty: cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilised, and measured-resection versus gap technique. Int Orthop. 2014;38(3):531-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2133-9. [PubMed: 24146174]. [PubMed Central: PMC3936082].
18. Singh VK, Varkey R, Trehan R, Kamat Y, Raghavan R, Adhikari A. Functional outcome after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using measured resection versus gap balancing techniques: A randomised controlled study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012;20(3):344-7. doi: 10.1177/230949901202000316. [PubMed: 23255643].
19. Churchill JL, Khlopas A, Sultan AA, Harwin SF, Mont MA. Gap-balancing versus measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty: A comparison study. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(1): 13-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608820. [PubMed: 29179222].
Files
IssueVol 12 No 1 (2026) QRcode
SectionResearch Articles
Keywords
Knee Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis of Knee Outcome Measures Range of Motion
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Shah F, Thakkar C, Pandya D, Shah R, Kishor A J, Desai T. Functional Outcomes of Measured Resection vs. Gap Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2026;12(1):50-4.