Arthroscopic Single-Row Repair in Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear:  A 60-Case Study of Functional Outcomes and Structural Integration at   2-Year Follow-Up

Jaimeen Jesalpura; Shailin Shah; Vikas Patel

doi:10.18502/jost.v11i4.20290

Arthroscopic Single-Row Repair in Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear: A 60-Case Study of Functional Outcomes and Structural Integration at 2-Year Follow-Up

Jaimeen Jesalpura

Shailin Shah

Vikas Patel

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess practical results and tendon healing in individuals experiencing full-thickness rotator cuff tears handled using single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (SR-ARCR), emphasizing its cost-effectiveness in resource-limited settings. Furthermore, the analysis includes evaluation of fatty muscle degeneration, glenohumeral joint arthritis, the significance of subscapularis tendon repair, and the impact of biceps tenotomy.
Methods: 60 rotator cuff reconstructions with a minimum of 24-month follow-up and all treated by SR-ARCR were evaluated. Functional assessment was done by Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) Score for shoulder, and structural assessment was performed by Sugaya grading. While CMS and UCLA scores are expressed as unitless numerical scales derived from components involving pain, function, range of motion (ROM) (in degrees), and strength (in kilograms), the Sugaya grading system is a qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification without numerical units.
Results: Mean follow-up was 35.93 ± 26.24 months with a minimum of 24 months. We noted a significant increase in post-operative mean CMS (range: 0-100) to 94.83 ± 7.78 (P < 0.001) and mean UCLA Score (range: 0-35) to 33.82 ± 6.70 (P < 0.001). Active forward flexion increased to 166.50 ± 11.62º (P < 0.001), external rotation (in degrees) increased to 79.17 ± 10.13º (P < 0.001), muscle strength (in kilograms) (0-25 kg) increased to 22.78 ± 3.32 (P < 0.001), and visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-10) decreased to 1.20 ± 0.75 (P < 0.001) post operatively. Patients with Sugaya 1 grading (85% of patients) had CMS of 97.06 ± 5.21 (P < 0.001), Sugaya 2 (10%) had score of 82.67 ± 9.42 (P < 0.001), and Sugaya 3 or higher (5%) had score of 81.33 ± 6.35 (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: SR-ARCR offered excellent outcomes cost-effectively with structural integration of rotator cuff at 24 months when tension-free repair of cuff was done.

1. Van Der Meijden OA, Westgard P, Chandler Z, Gaskill TR, Kokmeyer D, Millett PJ. Rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: current concepts review and evidence based guidelines. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(2):197-218. [PubMed: 22530194]. [PubMed Central: PMC3325631].
2. Davey MS, Hurley ET, Carroll PJ, Galbraith JG, Shannon F, Kaar K, et al. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Improved Clinical Outcomes and Low Revision Rates at 10-Year Follow Up: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023;39(2):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.11.002. [PubMed: 36604006].
3. Veen EJD, Boeddha AV, Diercks RL, Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Landman EBM, Koorevaar CT. Arthroscopic isolated long head of biceps tenotomy in patients with degenerative rotator cuff tears: mid term clinical results and prognostic factors. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31(3):441-8. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02787-z. [PubMed: 32914244]. [PubMed Central: PMC7981293].
4. Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nové-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I. Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(3):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.008. [PubMed: 15889020].
5. Busconi BB, DeAngelis N, Guerrero PE. The proximal biceps tendon: tricks and pearls. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev.
2008;16(3):187-94. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e318183c134. [PubMed: 18703980].
6. Boileau P, Ahrens PM, Hatzidakis AM. Entrapment of the long head of the biceps tendon: the hourglass biceps--a cause of pain and locking of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(3):249-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.001. [PubMed: 15111893].
7. Kim YK, Jung KH, Kim JW, Kim US, Hwang DH. Factors affecting rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for mediumsized or larger cuff tears: a retrospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(6):1012-20.
10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.016. [PubMed: 29290609].
8. de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1701-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.08.1241. [PubMed: 19457838].
9. Huang R, Wang S, Wang Y, Qin X, Sun Y. Systematic Review of AllArthroscopic Versus Mini-Open Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22857. doi: 10.1038/srep22857. [PubMed: 26947557]. [PubMed Central: PMC4780011].
10. Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, Nottage WM. Allarthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(3):234-8. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50036. [PubMed: 12627146].
11. Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(12):1861-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279575. [PubMed: 16210578].
12. Nicholas SJ, Lee SJ, Mullaney MJ, Tyler TF, Fukunaga T, Johnson CD, et al. Functional Outcomes After Double-Row Versus Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(10):2325967116667398. doi: 10.1177/2325967116667398. [PubMed: 27757408]. [PubMed Central: PMC5051628].
13. Faulkner ND, Getelman MH, Burns JP, Bahk MS, Karzel RP, Snyder SJ. Regarding "meta-analysis comparing single-row and doublerow repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears". J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(9):e223-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.027. [PudMed: 25127913].
14. Barlow JD, Everhart JS. Arthroscopic Subscapularis Repair Through a Single Anterior Portal. Arthrosc Tech.
2017;6(5):e1593-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.014. [PubMed: 29354479]. [PubMed Central: PMC5709722].
15. Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R. Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(6):1184-93. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.F.00007. [PubMed: 17545420].
16. Frost A, Zafar MS, Maffulli N. Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the management of pathologic lesions of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(4):828-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546508322179. [PubMed: 18762669].
17. Moorthy V, Tan AHC. Should long head of biceps tenodesis or tenotomy be routinely performed in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs? J Orthop. 2020;21:161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.033. [PubMed: 32255998]. [PubMed Central: PMC7114602].
18. Burkhart SS, Barth JR, Richards DP, Zlatkin MB, Larsen M. Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears with stage 3 and 4 fatty degeneration. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(4):347-54. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.012. [PubMed: 17418325].
19. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S. Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(6):550-4. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00211-8. [PubMed: 14671517].
20. Herve A, Thomazeau H, Favard L, Colmar M, Mansat P, Walch G, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of osteoarthritis twenty years after rotator cuff repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(5):813-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.02.013. [PubMed: 31204180].
21. Malavolta EA, Assunção JH, Andrade-Silva FB, Gracitelli MEC, Kiyomoto HD, Ferreira Neto AA. Prognostic Factors for Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11(4):23259671231160738. doi: 10.1177/23259671231160738. [PubMed: 37065182]. [PubMed Central: PMC10102950].
22. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.011. [PubMed: 16325080].
23. Yoshida M, Collin P, Josseaume T, Lädermann A, Goto H, Sugimoto K, et al. Post-operative rotator cuff integrity, based on Sugaya's classification, can reflect abduction muscle strength of the shoulder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(1):161-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4608-5. [PubMed: 28643102].
24. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(2):219-24. doi: 10.2106/00004623200402000-00002. [PubMed: 14960664].
25. Russell RD, Knight JR, Mulligan E, Khazzam MS. Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair does not correlate with patient function and pain: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(4):265-71. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.M.00265. [PubMed: 24553881].

Files	XML PDF (488KB)
Issue	Vol 11 No 4 (2025)
Section	Research Articles
DOI	https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v11i4.20290
Keywords
Rotator Cuff Cost Tendons

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Jesalpura J, Shah S, Patel V. Arthroscopic Single-Row Repair in Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear: A 60-Case Study of Functional Outcomes and Structural Integration at 2-Year Follow-Up. J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2025;11(4):182-6.

Vancouver

Download Citation