Functional Outcome of Radius Ulna Fracture Treated With Nailing in Adults
Abstract
Background: Intramedullary nailing (IMN) of radius and ulna has its own advantages and disadvantages. The chances of infection are significantly decreased, as it is usually a closed procedure and has less periosteal stripping. This study was undertaken to evaluate the results of radius ulna nailing and its radiological and functional outcomes using this method.
Methods: This study of forearm bones fracture treated by IMN was performed on 30 patients prospectively admitted at SVP Hospital Ahmedabad, India, from 2020 to 2022. Clinically, fracture was united when the patient was completely pain free. Patients were followed up at monthly intervals till union and were assessed clinically and radiographically, and details were recorded.
Results: The evaluation of the result was done using Anderson et al. criteria. 28 (93.33%) patients had good to excellent results. Twenty-nine (96.66%) patients had good radiological union. Of these, one patient had union at 22 weeks and one had union at 36 weeks. Twenty-one (70%) patients had union within 4 months.
Conclusion: Use of IMN has resulted in, and continues to result in, predictable and good outcomes. Complication rates are lower compared to plate osteosynthesis, although application of above-elbow (AE) slab is a downside of the procedure. The IMN has a future in repair of forearm fractures considering its low complication rates, low cost, and good results.
2. Rao R. A prospective study of pediatric forearm bone fractures treated with closed intramedullary square nailing. J Orthop. 2009;6(1):12.
3. Lee YH, Lee SK, Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Kim KH. Interlocking contoured intramedullary nail fixation for
selected diaphyseal fractures of the forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1891-8. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.G.01636. [PubMed: 18762649].
4. Barry M, Paterson JM. A flexible intramedullary nails for fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(7):947-53. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.15273. [PubMed: 15446515].
5. Street DM. Intramedullary forearm nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;34(212):219-30. [PubMed: 3769288].
6. Anderson LD, Sisk D, Tooms RE, Park WI, 3rd. Compression-plate fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57(3):287-97. [PubMed: 1091653].
7. Smith H, Sage FP. Medullary Fixation of Forearm Fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1957;39(1):91-188.
8. Talwalkar AK, Talwalkar CA. Internal fixation of fractures of radius and ulna in adults with Talwalkar intramedullary nails. Indian J Orthop. 1967;1(1):26-30.
9. Moerman J, Lenaert A, De Coninck D, Haeck L, Verbeke S, Uyttendaele D, et al. Intramedullary fixation of forearm fractures in adults. Acta Orthop Belg. 1996;62(1):34-40. [PubMed: 8669253].
10. Marek FM. Axial fixation of forearm fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1961;43(8):1099-114.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 11 No 4 (2025) | |
| Section | Research Articles | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v11i4.20286 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Intramedullary Nailing Radius Fractures Ulna Fractures | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |


