Simple Suture vs. Vertical Mattress: Choosing the Best Suture for Palmar Incision Based on a Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Background: Despite the prevalence of palmar injuries and surgeries, no consensus exists regarding the type of wound closure. The present study compares simple sutures and vertical mattresses sutures in carpal tunnel release (CTR), trigger finger release (TFR), and trigger thumb release (TTR).
Methods: A total of 89 surgeries were randomized to either simple or vertical mattress sutures. Outcomes including pain, infection, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), satisfaction level, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) were evaluated on postoperative day 3, week 3, and month 3. Month 3 assessments were mostly performed remotely due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Results: The mean pain was higher in the vertical mattress sutures group compared with simple sutures, though the pain difference was statistically significant only on day 3. No significant mean difference was found between the two groups regarding POSAS items. Some patients underwent bilateral CTR with simple sutures on the one hand and vertical mattresses sutures on the other. The results of their investigation were consistent with the other findings.
Conclusion: Vertical mattress suture in palmar surgeries is associated with greater short-term pain. Other variables did not differ between the two groups at different times. Hence, conclusively, regardless of the short-term pain associated with simple suture, both types of sutures can be used in hand surgeries with similar long-term results.
2. Wu T. Plastic surgery made easy - simple techniques for closing skin defects and improving cosmetic results. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35(7):492-6. [PubMed: 16820819].
3. Shannon SF, Houdek MT, Wyles CC, Yuan BJ, Cross WW, 3rd, Cass JR, et al. Allgöwer-Donati Versus Vertical Mattress Suture Technique Impact on Perfusion in Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial Using Intraoperative Angiography. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(2):97-102. doi: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000731. [PubMed: 28129268].
4. Dietz UA, Kuhfuss I, Debus ES, Thiede A. Mario Donati and the vertical mattress suture of the skin. World J Surg. 2006;30(2): 141-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0201-z. [PubMed: 16425084].
5. Kundra RK, Newman S, Saithna A, Lewis AC, Srinivasan S, Srinivasan K. Absorbable or non-absorbable sutures? A prospective, randomised evaluation of aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing elective day-case hand and wrist surgery.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(8):665-7. doi: 10.1308/003588410x12699663905113. [PubMed: 20659358]. [PubMed Central: PMC3229375].
6. MacFarlane RJ, Donnelly TD, Khan Y, Morapudi S, Waseem M, Fischer J. Clinical outcome and wound healing following carpal tunnel decompression: a comparison of two common suture materials. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:270137. doi: 10.1155/2014/270137. [PubMed: 25165693]. [PubMed Central: PMC4140113].
7. Bailey IS, Karran SE, Toyn K, Brough P, Ranaboldo C, Karran SJ. Community surveillance of complications after hernia surgery. BMJ. 1992;304(6825):469-71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6825.469. [PubMed: 1547415]. [PubMed Central: PMC1881120].
8. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Group UEC. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02060. [PubMed: 15866967].
9. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):1960-5. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. [PubMed: 15253184].
10. Van De Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, Van Der Horst CM, Van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the patient and observer scar assessment scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6. [PubMed: 16079683].
11. Wang AS, Kleinerman R, Armstrong AW, Fitzmaurice S, Pascucci A, Awasthi S, et al. Set-back versus buried vertical mattress suturing: results of a randomized blinded trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.018. [PubMed: 25129615].
12. Kappel S, Kleinerman R, King TH, Sivamani R, Taylor S, Nguyen U, et al. Does wound eversion improve cosmetic outcome?: Results of a randomized, split-scar, comparative trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(4):668-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.032. [PubMed: 25619206]. [PubMed Central: PMC4950516].
13. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Gottardi A, Cherubino M, Uccella S, Valdatta L. Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):36.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.001. [PubMed: 20417924].
14. Quinn J, Wells G, Sutcliffe T, Jarmuske M, Maw J, Stiell I, et al. Tissue adhesive versus suture wound repair at 1 year: randomized clinical trial correlating early, 3-month, and 1-year cosmetic outcome. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;32(6):645-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70061-7. [PubMed: 9832658].
15. Bolster M, Schipper C, Van Sterkenburg S, Ruettermann M, Reijnen M. Single interrupted sutures compared with Donati sutures after open carpal tunnel release: a prospective randomised trial. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013;47(4):289-91. doi: 10.3109/2000656x.2012.762006. [PubMed: 23710789].
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 11 No 3 (2025) | |
| Section | Research Articles | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v11i3.19406 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Sutures Trigger Thumb Trigger Digits Carpal Tunnel Release | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
