Research Articles

Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Complications of Non-Surgical Management for Clavicular Middle Third Fractures

Abstract

Background: Clavicle fractures are relatively common, and most often occur in the middle third. Fractures that are not displaced or are displaced with no other indication for surgical intervention are treated supportively. Displaced fractures that have been managed non-surgically have had acceptable outcomes. The goal of this study is to evaluate pain scores, the resumption of daily activities, rates of acceptable healing, non-union, malunion, and the need for additional surgical intervention.

Methods: This observational study was conducted on 432 patients with midclavicular fractures who were referred to a high-level trauma center. All patients were treated non-surgically and followed for six months. The primary outcomes were patients’ function or disability, assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores. The secondary outcomes included the rate of pain relief, measured by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) score, as well as complications such as malunion, nonunion, and the need for secondary surgical intervention.

Results: A total of 432 patients were enrolled. The rates of malunion and nonunion were 63.4% and 2.3%, respectively. Patients with malunion exhibited a higher pain score (P < 0.001). The average UCLA score among patients was 32.53, which corresponds to good and excellent grades; it was significantly lower for those with malunion (P < 0.001). The mean DASH score was 5.92, and there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding malunion and normal union (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a low non-union rate, good functionality, and a high rate of satisfaction among patients with middle third clavicle fractures who were treated non-surgically.

1. Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):452-6. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.126613. [PubMed: 12378163].
2. Aski B, Beshaj R, Patil R, Rasakatla S. Surgical outcome of displaced middle third clavicular fractures treated with locking compression plate. Burns Trauma. 2014;2(1):36. doi: 10.4103/2321-3868.126092.
3. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma S. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):1-10. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.F.00020. [PubMed: 17200303].
4. Wirth M, Rockwood C, Gilot G. Injuries to the sternoclavicular joint. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, Rockwood CA, Green DP, editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1365-97.
5. Crenshaw Jr. AH, Perez EA. Fractures of the shoulder girdle, arm and forearm. In: Crenshaw Jr. AH, Perez EA. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 2008, p. 3420-4.
6. Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(7):504-7. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000172287.44278.ef. [PubMed: 16056089].
7. Schwarz N, Höcker K. Osteosynthesis of irreducible fractures of the clavicle with 2.7-MM ASIF plates. J Trauma. 1992;33(2):179-83. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199208000-00003. [PubMed: 1507278].
8. McKee MD, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH. Midshaft malunions of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(5):790-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00003. [PubMed: 12728026].
9. Denard PJ, Koval KJ, Cantu RV, Weinstein JN. Management of midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005;34(11):527-36. [PubMed: 16375059].
10. Housner JA, Kuhn JE. Clavicle fractures: individualizing treatment for fracture type. Phys Sportsmed. 2003;31(12):30-6. doi: 10.3810/psm.2003.12.597. [PubMed: 20086451].
11. Daniilidis K, Raschke MJ, Vogt B, Herbort M, Schliemann B, Günther N, et al. Comparison between conservative and surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures: outcome of 151 cases. Technol Health Care. 2013;21(2):143-7. doi: 10.3233/thc- 130714. [PubMed: 23510974].
12. Polinsky SG, Edmonds EW, Bastrom TP, Manhard CE, Heyworth BE, Bae DS, et al. 5-Year Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment of Completely Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures in Teenagers. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(4):1032-9. doi: 10.1177/03635465241228818. [PubMed: 38439558].
13. George DM, McKay BP, Jaarsma RL. The long-term outcome of displaced mid-third clavicle fractures on scapular and shoulder function: variations between immediate surgery, delayed surgery, and nonsurgical management. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(5):669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.09.037. [PubMed: 25457191].
14. Thormodsgard TM, Stone K, Ciraulo DL, Camuso MR, Desjardins S. An assessment of patient satisfaction with nonoperative management of clavicular fractures using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1126-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182396541. [PubMed: 22071918].
15. Subramanyam KN, Mundargi AV, Gopakumar KU, Bharath T, Prabhu MV, Khanchandani P. Displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults - is non-operative management enough? Injury. 2021;52(3):493-500. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.019. [PubMed: 33066986].
Files
IssueVol 11 No 2 (2025) QRcode
SectionResearch Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v11i2.18883
Keywords
Clavicle Fracture Conservative Treatment Union
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Rezai M, Khodamoradi A, Mohammad Valipour A, Hessam R, Mohammadi M, Javdani Esfahani K, Kheradpishe A. Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Complications of Non-Surgical Management for Clavicular Middle Third Fractures. J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2025;11(2):61-3.