Mortality Rate and Quality of Life in Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Dynamic Hip Screw
Abstract
Background: Intertrochanteric (IT) fracture is one of the most common fractures in adults. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) surgery is a surgical procedure for IT fracture treatment. This study evaluated the mortality rate and quality of life (QOL) among these patients one year after the surgery.
Methods: This cohort study was conducted on 110 patients with IT fractures treated with DHS from 2017 to 2019. A questionnaire was completed for each patient before, during, and after surgery. Preoperative information included demographics, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, variables such as IT fracture classification, injury mechanism, lateral wall, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) comorbidity classification. Tip-apex distance (TAD), nail position at the femoral head, and the amount of bleeding during the operation were achieved during and immediately after the surgery. The mortality rate was determined one year after the surgery, and the surviving patients were assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire.
Results: The mortality rate among patients who underwent DHS was 31.81%. There was no significant difference between living and dead patients regarding demographic information, surgical techniques, and comorbidities. There was no association between patients regarding the average of all areas of physical, mental, and overall health and gender. There was no significant relationship between the mean of physical and mental health with the duration of hospital stay and the amount of bleeding during surgery. A history of diabetes, high blood pressure, and smoking in these patients was not associated with mortality and QOL.
Conclusion: The patient’s age is the most important risk factor for mortality after the DHS surgery.
2. Kesmezacar H, Ayhan E, Unlu MC, Seker A, Karaca S. Predictors of mortality in elderly patients with an intertrochanteric or a femoral neck fracture. J Trauma. 2010;68(1):153-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819adc50. [PubMed: 19797990].
3. Geiger F, Zimmermann-Stenzel M, Heisel C, Lehner B, Daecke
W. Trochanteric fractures in the elderly: the influence of primary hip arthroplasty on 1-year mortality. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(10):959-66. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007- 0423-7. [PubMed: 17899138]. [PubMed Central: PMC2111040].
4. Lindskog DM, Baumgaertner MR. Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12(3):179-90. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200405000-00006. [PubMed: 15161171].
5. Herman A, Landau Y, Gutman G, Ougortsin V, Chechick A, Shazar N. Radiological evaluation of intertrochanteric fracture fixation by the proximal femoral nail. Injury. 2012;43(6):856-63. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.030. [PubMed: 22134114].
6. David Lavelle G. Fractures and dislocations of the hip. In: Canale ST, editor. Campbell's operative Orthopedics. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby-Elsevier; 2008. 3237-308.
7. Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jonsson A, Zlowodzki M, Haidukewych GJ. Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(6):460-4. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162f67f. [PubMed: 19550235].
8. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32(Suppl 1):S1-S170. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. [PubMed: 29256945].
9. Mattisson L, Bojan A, Enocson A. Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord . 2018;19(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2276-3. [PubMed: 30314495]. [PubMed Central: PMC6186067].
10. Kenzora JE, McCarthy RE, Lowell JD, Sledge CB. Hip fracture mortality. Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery, and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;(186):45-56. [PubMed: 6723159].
11. Nasab SAM, Khorramdin E. The assessment of mortality and quality of life after intertrochanteric fracture of femur in patients older than 60 at Emam Khomeini Hospital of Ahvaz. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(4):895-8. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.13146. [PubMed: 29067061]. [PubMed Central: PMC5648960].
12. Fractures of the pelvic ring. Burgess AR, Jones AL. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 1794-825.
13. Fakoor M, Atshani M, Ghasemi MA. Return to previous activities and quality of life in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture surgery. Jundishapur Sci Med J. 2016;15(3):415-22. [In Persian].
14. Schnell S, Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Bingham KW, Kates SL. The 1-year mortality of patients treated in a hip fracture program for elders. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010;1(1):6-14. doi: 10.1177/2151458510378105. [PubMed: 23569656]. [PubMed Central: PMC3597289].
15. Shyu YI, Chen MC, Liang J, Lu JF, Wu CC, Su JY. Changes in quality of life among elderly patients with hip fracture in Taiwan. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15(2):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s00198- 003-1533-x. [PubMed: 14605800].
16. Mohan H, Kumar P. Surgical Treatment of Type 31-A1 Two-part Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Is Proximal Femoral Nail Superior to Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation? Cureus. 2019;11(2):e4110. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4110. [PubMed: 31058004]. [PubMed Central: PMC6476610].
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 8, No 2 (2022) | |
Section | Research Articles | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/jost.v8i2.9311 | |
Keywords | ||
: Hip Fractures Morbidity Mortality Cohort Studies |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |