Kocher-Langenbeck Approach in Prone Position

  • Seyyed Hossein Shafiei Mail Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, TUMS
  • babak Siavashi Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, TUMS
  • Farhad Mahdavi Resident of Orthopedic Surgery, TUMS
  • Mohammad Heshmati Resident of Orthopedic Surgery, TUMS
  • Mohammad Reza Sadeghi Resident of Orthopedic Surgery, TUMS
  • Mohammad Reza Golbakhsh Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, TUMS
Kocher-Langenbeck; Prone Position; Fracture Fixation, Internal


Background: The posterior approach for acetabular fractures is the Kocher-Langenbeck (K-L) approach which is performed in lateral and prone positions. Lateral position is a familiar position for most orthopedic surgeons. Prone position yields multiple advantages compared to lateral position.

Methods: Between the years 2016 and 2019, 18 patients with selected acetabular fractures in which the best decision was surgical fixation using K-L approach were studied. The surgical procedure was done using K-L approach with the patient in the prone position and we used Matta scoring system to evaluate post-operative reduction quality.

Results: According to the Matta system, the anatomic reduction was observed in 13 patients (86.6%). Imperfect reduction was observed in 2 patients (13.3%), no patient had a poor reduction. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head was seen in one patient (6.6%) and no infection and heterotopic ossification (HO) was noted.

Conclusions: The advantage of this approach in a prone position is believed to be better exposure and greater access to the quadrilateral plate (QLP) and anterior column indirectly. One of the most important advantages is that in the prone position, handling the reduction devices to indirectly reduce anterior column or QLP is much easier.



1. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: Classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:1615-46. [PubMed: 14239854].

2. Pennal GF, Davidson J, Garside H, Plewes J. Results of treatment of acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;(151):115-23. [PubMed: 7418294].

3. Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1993.

4. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: Accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(11):1632-45. [PubMed: 8934477].

5. Waddell J, Johnson K, Hein W, Raabe J, FitzGerald G, Turibio F. Orthopaedic practice in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: Results from the Global Orthopaedic Registry (GLORY). Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(9 Suppl):5-13. [PubMed: 21290026].

6. Negrin LL, Benson CD, Seligson D. Prone or lateral? Use of the kocher-langenbeck approach to treat acetabular fractures. J Trauma. 2010;69(1):137-41. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b28ba6. [PubMed: 20016388].

7. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM. Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):1559-67. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00444. [PubMed: 22992846].

8. Carmack DB, Moed BR, McCarroll K, Freccero D. Accuracy of detecting screw penetration of the acetabulum with intraoperative fluoroscopy and computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(9):1370-5. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200109000-00012. [PubMed: 11568200].
How to Cite
Shafiei SH, Siavashi babak, Mahdavi F, Heshmati M, Sadeghi MR, Golbakhsh MR. Kocher-Langenbeck Approach in Prone Position. J Orthop Spine Trauma. 4(4):69-70.
Brief Report